From a397353916db36d925f5aec654fc66d5ca09f427 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hathach Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:58:39 +0700 Subject: fix ci build with rp2040 --- src/osal/osal_pico.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/osal') diff --git a/src/osal/osal_pico.h b/src/osal/osal_pico.h index c277af271..bae1217eb 100644 --- a/src/osal/osal_pico.h +++ b/src/osal/osal_pico.h @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static inline bool osal_queue_receive(osal_queue_t qhdl, void* data) // TODO: revisit... docs say that mutexes are never used from IRQ context, // however osal_queue_recieve may be. therefore my assumption is that // the fifo mutex is not populated for queues used from an IRQ context - assert(!qhdl->ff.mutex); + //assert(!qhdl->ff.mutex); _osal_q_lock(qhdl); bool success = tu_fifo_read(&qhdl->ff, data); @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static inline bool osal_queue_send(osal_queue_t qhdl, void const * data, bool in // TODO: revisit... docs say that mutexes are never used from IRQ context, // however osal_queue_recieve may be. therefore my assumption is that // the fifo mutex is not populated for queues used from an IRQ context - assert(!qhdl->ff.mutex); + //assert(!qhdl->ff.mutex); _osal_q_lock(qhdl); bool success = tu_fifo_write(&qhdl->ff, data); -- cgit v1.3.1