Now that we have the same option for SPL and TPL, simplify the logic for
determining the initial stack.

Note that this changes behaviour as current SPL_STACK is a fallback for
TPL. However, that was likely unintended and can be handled with Kconfig
defaults if needed.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Suggested-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

At present there is a hex value SPL_STACK which both determines whether
SPL has its own initial stack and the hex value of that stack.

Split off the former into SPL_HAVE_INIT_STACK with SPL_STACK depending
on that and only providing the latter.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: Resync defconfig files]

Use the new symbol to refer to any 'SPL' build, including TPL and VPL

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

- Make all users of CUSTOM_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR reference SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR
- Introduce HAS_CUSTOM_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR to allow for setting the stack
  pointer directly, otherwise we use the common calculation.
- On some platforms that were using the standard calculation but did not
  set CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_SIZE / CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR, set them.
- On a small number of platforms that were not subtracting
  GENERATED_GBL_DATA_SIZE do so now via the standard calculation.
- CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_OFFSET is now widely unused, so remove it from most
  board config header files.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from.  So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry.  Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.

In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.

This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents.  There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

Rather than have a long and if check in the Makefile, mark the default
lowlevel_init function as weak (as we do on armv8) so that SoCs can
override it if needed, and it will still be discarded if unused.
Provide a weak s_init as well to allow for this to link and be
discarded.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

The SPL and U-Boot proper may use different initial stack
locations, which are configured via CONFIG_SPL_STACK and
CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR defines. The lowlevel_init.S
code needs to handle this in the same way as crt0.S

Without this fix, setting the U-Boot stack location to some
place, which is not safely accessible by the SPL (such as
the DRAM), causes a very early SPL deadlock.

Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

We now have the CONFIG_SPL_DM for code within SPL to toggle caring about
DM or not.  Without this change platforms that do enable CONFIG_DM but
not CONFIG_SPL_DM may be broken (such as OMAP5).

Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

This function has grown into something of a monster. Some boards are setting
up a console and DRAM here in SPL. This requires global_data which should be
set up in one place (crt0.S).

There is no need for SPL to use s_init() for anything since board_init_f()
is called immediately afterwards.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Building some arm boards with older binutils may produce errors like this:

---8<---
crt0.S: Assembler messages:
crt0.S:70: Error: register expected, not '#(184)' -- `sub sp,#(184)'
--->8---

Use canonical version of the subtract mnemonic to avoid those issues.

Reported-by: Alexey Smishlayev <alexey@xtech2.lv>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>