As part of bringing the master branch back in to next, we need to allow
for all of these changes to exist here.

Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.

This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.

Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

Remove <common.h> from all mach-imx, CPU specific sub-directories and
include/asm/arch-mx* files and when needed add missing include files
directly.

Acked-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

nodeoff variable should be variable off returned by fdt_path_offset() so
let's rename it to off.

Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

  It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

  void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

  #include <asm/u-boot.h>
  void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

  struct bd_info;
  void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

  <smpl>
  @@
  typedef bd_t;
  @@
  -bd_t
  +struct bd_info
  </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

There are different parts from one SoC. Take i.MX6ULL for example,
some part might not have ENET, some might have; some might not have
USB, some might have. The information could be got from OCOTP,
to make one image support the different parts, we need runtime
disable linux kernel dts node and uboot driver probe if the
corresponding module not exists in the part.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>