CI: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-rockchip/-/pipelines/29452

- New SoC support: RK3506, RK3582;
- New Board support: RK3528 FriendlyElec NanoPi Zero2;
- Other fixes

Switch rk3288-veyron boards to upstream devicetree.

Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>

Remove DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR from files where gd is not used, and
drop the unnecessary inclusion of asm/global_data.h.

Headers should be included directly by the files that need them,
rather than indirectly via global_data.h.

Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> #STMicroelectronics boards and STM32MP1 ram test driver
Tested-by: Anshul Dalal <anshuld@ti.com> #TI boards
Acked-by: Yao Zi <me@ziyao.cc> #TH1520
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

Move this so we can include it from sandbox, needed since it is in a
bloblist and must have a check.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

This file reads from the environment but does not include the correct
header. Update it.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

We are about to add a large number of new entries. Update the prefix to
be a little shorter.

For SMBIOS items, use SYSID_SM_ (for System Management) which is enough
to distinguish it. For now at least, it seems that most items will be
for SMBIOS.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Raymond Mao <raymond.mao@linaro.org>

Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> says:

When the SPL build-phase was first created it was designed to solve a
particular problem (the need to init SDRAM so that U-Boot proper could
be loaded). It has since expanded to become an important part of U-Boot,
with three phases now present: TPL, VPL and SPL

Due to this history, the term 'SPL' is used to mean both a particular
phase (the one before U-Boot proper) and all the non-proper phases.
This has become confusing.

For a similar reason CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is set to 'y' for all 'SPL'
phases, not just SPL. So code which can only be compiled for actual SPL,
for example, must use something like this:

   #if defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) && !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD)

In Makefiles we have similar issues. SPL_ has been used as a variable
which expands to either SPL_ or nothing, to chose between options like
CONFIG_BLK and CONFIG_SPL_BLK. When TPL appeared, a new SPL_TPL variable
was created which expanded to 'SPL_', 'TPL_' or nothing. Later it was
updated to support 'VPL_' as well.

This series starts a change in terminology and usage to resolve the
above issues:

- The word 'xPL' is used instead of 'SPL' to mean a non-proper build
- A new CONFIG_XPL_BUILD define indicates that the current build is an
  'xPL' build
- The existing CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is changed to mean SPL; it is not now
  defined for TPL and VPL phases
- The existing SPL_ Makefile variable is renamed to SPL_
- The existing SPL_TPL Makefile variable is renamed to PHASE_

It should be noted that xpl_phase() can generally be used instead of
the above CONFIGs without a code-space or run-time penalty.

This series does not attempt to convert all of U-Boot to use this new
terminology but it makes a start. In particular, renaming spl.h and
common/spl seems like a bridge too far at this point.

The series is fully bisectable. It has also been checked to ensure there
are no code-size changes on any commit.

Use the new symbol to refer to any 'SPL' build, including TPL and VPL

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Both regulators_enable_boot_on/off() are unused and superseded by
regulator uclass regulator_post_probe(). Remove both functions.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>