Move this header out of the common header.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

We should not use typedefs in U-Boot. They cannot be used as forward
declarations which means that header files must include the full header to
access them.

Drop the typedef and rename the struct to remove the _s suffix which is
now not useful.

This requires quite a few header-file additions.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Move this function out of common.h and into a relevant header file.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

This header file is now only used by files that access internal
environment features. Drop it from various places where it is not needed.

Acked-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

At present many TPM calls assume there is only one TPM in the system and
look up this TPM themselves. This is inconsistent with driver model, which
expects all driver methods to have a device parameter. Update the code to
correct this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

These are needed for the 2018 version of Chromium OS vboot. Add an
implementation for TPM v1, with v2 to come later.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

There are no changes in this commit but a new organization of the code
as follow.

* cmd/ directory:
        > move existing code from cmd/tpm.c in cmd/tpm-common.c
	> move specific code in cmd/tpm-v1.c
	> create a specific header file with generic definitions for
	  commands only called cmd/tpm-user-utils.h

* lib/ directory:
        > move existing code from lib/tpm.c in lib/tpm-common.c
	> move specific code in lib/tpm-v1.c
	> create a specific header file with generic definitions for
	  the library itself called lib/tpm-utils.h

* include/ directory:
        > move existing code from include/tpm.h in include/tpm-common.h
	> move specific code in include/tpm-v1.h

Code designated as 'common' is compiled if TPM are used. Code designated
as 'specific' is compiled only if the right specification has been
selected.

All files include tpm-common.h.
Files in cmd/ include tpm-user-utils.h.
Files in lib/ include tpm-utils.h.
Depending on the specification, files may include either (not both)
tpm-v1.h or tpm-v2.h.

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
[trini: Fix a few more cases of tpm.h -> tpm-v1.h, some Kconfig logic]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from.  So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry.  Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.

In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.

This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents.  There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

U-Boot widely uses error() as a bit noisier variant of printf().

This macro causes name conflict with the following line in
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:

  # define __compiletime_error(message) __attribute__((error(message)))

This prevents us from using __compiletime_error(), and makes it
difficult to fully sync BUILD_BUG macros with Linux.  (Notice
Linux's BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG is implemented by using compiletime_assert().)

Let's convert error() into now treewide-available pr_err().

Done with the help of Coccinelle, excluing tools/ directory.

The semantic patch I used is as follows:

// <smpl>
@@@@
-error
+pr_err
 (...)
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: Re-run Coccinelle]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

GCC 6.2 reasonably complains about the current code:

../cmd/tpm_test.c: In function ‘do_tpmtest’:
../cmd/tpm_test.c:540:3: warning: this ‘for’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
   for (i = 0; i < argc; i++)
   ^~~
../cmd/tpm_test.c:542:4: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the ‘for’
    printf("\n------\n");
    ^~~~~~

Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Updated to remove C99 variable decl:
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>