The existing compatible name for U-Boot's k3 system controller driver
i.e "ti,am625-system-controller" has been added to linux[1] device-tree.
This compatible in kernel is meant for configuring the Control Module
registers (CTRL_MMR0).
However in U-Boot, the matching driver was being used to load the system
firmware on the secure M-cores by the R5 SPL and therefore must be
updated to a different compatible to avoid conflicts.
Therefore, this patch renames all references of the compatible to
"ti,am654-tisci-rproc-r5". The "-r5" is appended so as to avoid any
future conflicts since r5 specific compatibles should only be useful for
U-Boot.
[1]: 5959618631fe ("dt-bindings: mfd: ti,j721e-system-controller: Add compatible string for AM654")
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250421214620.3770172-2-afd@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Anshul Dalal <anshuld@ti.com>
If there is an optional boot notification channel that an SoC uses separate from the rx path, use the same. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The K3 R5F remoteproc driver in U-Boot was upstreamed prior to the equivalent remoteproc driver in the Linux kernel. Some of the DT properties used in U-Boot got upstreamed using different names in Linux kernel. The modified property names include the R5F cluster mode configuration property "lockstep-mode"; and three different individual R5F core config properties - "atcm-enable", "btcm-enable" and "loczrama". The property names were updated as follows: lockstep-mode => ti,cluster-mode atcm-enable => ti,atcm-enable btcm-enable => ti,btcm-enable loczrama => ti,loczrama Update the K3 R5F remoteproc driver, the corresponding binding, and all the existing usage in AM65x, J721E and J7200 dts files all at once to use the new properties and to not break any bisectability. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
The K3 J7200 SoCs have two dual-core Arm R5F clusters/subsystems, with 2 R5F cores each, one in each of the MCU and MAIN voltage domains. These clusters are a revised version compared to those present on J721E SoCs. Update the K3 R5F remoteproc bindings with the compatible info relevant to these R5F clusters/subsystems on K3 J7200 SoCs. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Some Texas Instruments K3 family of SoCs have one of more Digital Signal Processor (DSP) subsystems that are comprised of either a TMS320C66x CorePac and/or a next-generation TMS320C71x CorePac processor subsystem. Add the device tree bindings document for the C66x DSP devices on these SoCs. The added example illustrates the DT nodes for the first C66x DSP device present on the K3 J721E family of SoCs. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
The Texas Instruments K3 family of SoCs have one of more dual-core Arm Cortex R5F processor subsystems/clusters (R5FSS). Add the device tree bindings document for these R5F subsystem devices. These R5F processors do not have an MMU, and so require fixed memory carveout regions matching the firmware image addresses. The nodes require more than one memory region, with the first memory region used for DMA allocations at runtime. The remaining memory regions are reserved and are used for the loading and running of the R5F remote processors. The added example illustrates the DT nodes for the single R5FSS device present on K3 AM65x family of SoCs. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Add support for K3 based remoteproc driver that communicates with TISCI to start start a remote processor. Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
K3 specific SoCs have a dedicated microcontroller for doing resource management. Any HLOS/firmware on compute clusters should load a firmware to this microcontroller before accessing any resource. Adding support for loading this firmware. After the K3 system controller got loaded with firmware and started up it sends out a boot notification message through the secure proxy facility using the TI SCI protocol. Intercept and receive this message through the rproc start operation which will need to get invoked explicitly after the firmware got loaded. Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Many System on Chip(SoC) solutions are complex with multiple processors on the same die dedicated to either general purpose of specialized functions. Many examples do exist in today's SoCs from various vendors. Typical examples are micro controllers such as an ARM M3/M0 doing a offload of specific function such as event integration or power management or controlling camera etc. Traditionally, the responsibility of loading up such a processor with a firmware and communication has been with a High Level Operating System(HLOS) such as Linux. However, there exists classes of products where Linux would need to expect services from such a processor or the delay of Linux and operating system being able to load up such a firmware is unacceptable. To address these needs, we need some minimal capability to load such a system and ensure it is started prior to an Operating System(Linux or any other) is started up. NOTE: This is NOT meant to be a solve-all solution, instead, it tries to address certain class of SoCs and products that need such a solution. A very simple model is introduced here as part of the initial support that supports microcontrollers with internal memory (no MMU, no execution from external memory, or specific image format needs). This basic framework can then (hopefully) be extensible to other complex SoC processor support as need be. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>