This creates a new framework for handling of pin control devices,
i.e. devices that control different aspects of package pins.

This uclass handles pinmuxing and pin configuration; pinmuxing
controls switching among silicon blocks that share certain physical
pins, pin configuration handles electronic properties such as pin-
biasing, load capacitance etc.

This framework can support the same device tree bindings, but if you
do not need full interface support, you can disable some features to
reduce memory foot print.  Typically around 1.5KB is necessary to
include full-featured uclass support on ARM board (CONFIG_PINCTRL +
CONFIG_PINCTRL_FULL + CONFIG_PINCTRL_GENERIC + CONFIG_PINCTRL_PINMUX),
for example.

We are often limited on code size for SPL.  Besides, we still have
many boards that do not support device tree configuration.  The full
pinctrl, which requires OF_CONTROL, does not make sense for those
boards.  So, this framework also has a Do-It-Yourself (let's say
simple pinctrl) interface.  With CONFIG_PINCTRL_FULL disabled, the
uclass itself provides no systematic mechanism for identifying the
peripheral device, applying pinctrl settings, etc.  They must be
done in each low-level driver.  In return, you can save much memory
footprint and it might be useful especially for SPL.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Just preparing for upcoming cleaning.

The board-specific linker script  board/vpac270/u-boot-spl.lds
has been touched to avoid build error.  It does not change the
size of spl/u-boot-spl.bin for this board, so it should be OK.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Clocks are an important feature of platforms and have become increasing
complex with time. Most modern SoCs have multiple PLLs and dozens of clock
dividers which distribute clocks to on-chip peripherals.

Some SoC implementations have a clock API which is private to that SoC family,
e.g. Tegra and Exynos. This is useful but it would be better to have a
common API that can be understood and used throughout U-Boot.

Add a simple clock API as a starting point. It supports querying and setting
the rate of a clock. Each clock is a device. To reduce memory and processing
overhead the concept of peripheral clocks is provided. These do not need to
be explicit devices - it is possible to write a driver that can adjust the
I2C clock (for example) without an explicit I2C clock device. This can
dramatically reduce the number of devices (and associated overhead) in a
complex SoC.

Clocks are referenced by a number, and it is expected that SoCs will define
that numbering themselves via an enum.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>