Replace Maximumm with Maximum in Kconfig symbol description, fix a typo.
No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
Reviewed-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>

The BLK symbol has a few meanings, one of which is that it controls the
driver model portion of a "block device". Rather than having this hidden
symbol be "default y if ..." it should be select'd by the various block
subsystems. Symbols such as PVBLOCK which already select'd BLK are
unchanged".

Reviewed-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

There are no users of the blk_create_device() function outside the uclass.
Let's make it static. This will ensure that new block drivers will use
blk_create_devicef().

Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

By using blk_create_devicef() instead of blk_create_devicef() the driver
can be simplified and brought into line with other block device drivers.

Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>

Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> says:

When the SPL build-phase was first created it was designed to solve a
particular problem (the need to init SDRAM so that U-Boot proper could
be loaded). It has since expanded to become an important part of U-Boot,
with three phases now present: TPL, VPL and SPL

Due to this history, the term 'SPL' is used to mean both a particular
phase (the one before U-Boot proper) and all the non-proper phases.
This has become confusing.

For a similar reason CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is set to 'y' for all 'SPL'
phases, not just SPL. So code which can only be compiled for actual SPL,
for example, must use something like this:

   #if defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) && !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD)

In Makefiles we have similar issues. SPL_ has been used as a variable
which expands to either SPL_ or nothing, to chose between options like
CONFIG_BLK and CONFIG_SPL_BLK. When TPL appeared, a new SPL_TPL variable
was created which expanded to 'SPL_', 'TPL_' or nothing. Later it was
updated to support 'VPL_' as well.

This series starts a change in terminology and usage to resolve the
above issues:

- The word 'xPL' is used instead of 'SPL' to mean a non-proper build
- A new CONFIG_XPL_BUILD define indicates that the current build is an
  'xPL' build
- The existing CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is changed to mean SPL; it is not now
  defined for TPL and VPL phases
- The existing SPL_ Makefile variable is renamed to SPL_
- The existing SPL_TPL Makefile variable is renamed to PHASE_

It should be noted that xpl_phase() can generally be used instead of
the above CONFIGs without a code-space or run-time penalty.

This series does not attempt to convert all of U-Boot to use this new
terminology but it makes a start. In particular, renaming spl.h and
common/spl seems like a bridge too far at this point.

The series is fully bisectable. It has also been checked to ensure there
are no code-size changes on any commit.

Use PHASE_ as the symbol to select a particular XPL build. This means
that SPL_TPL_ is no-longer set.

Update the comment in bootstage to refer to this symbol, instead of
SPL_

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Use XPL_ as the symbol to indicate an SPL build. This means that SPL_ is
no-longer set.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Use the new symbol to refer to any 'SPL' build, including TPL and VPL

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

When SPL_FS_LOADER is set to y and FS_LOADER is not enabled, the SPL build
fails with the following errors:

  AR      spl/boot/built-in.o
  LD      spl/u-boot-spl
arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd: drivers/misc/fs_loader.o: in function
`fw_get_filesystem_firmware':
/u-boot/drivers/misc/fs_loader.c:162: undefined reference to
`fs_set_blk_dev'
arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd: /home/frh/tdx/src/u-boot/drivers/misc/
fs_loader.c:185: undefined reference to `fs_read'
arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd: drivers/misc/fs_loader.o: in function
`select_fs_dev':
/u-boot/drivers/misc/fs_loader.c:89: undefined reference to
`fs_set_blk_dev_with_part'
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.spl:527: spl/u-boot-spl] Error 1
make: *** [Makefile:2055: spl/u-boot-spl] Error 2

Fix it by replacing the FS_LOADER with SPL_FS_LOADER in the Makefile, so
the fs.c with the necessary function definitions are compiled.

Fixes: b071a07743d4 ("drivers: misc: Makefile: Enable fs_loader compilation at SPL Level")
Suggested-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
Signed-off-by: Hiago De Franco <hiago.franco@toradex.com>
Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>

Prepare v2024.10-rc3