Add functions to iterate on all property with livetree
- dev_read_first_prop
- dev_read_next_prop
- dev_read_prop_by_prop
and
- ofnode_get_first_property
- ofnode_get_next_property
- ofnode_get_property_by_prop

And helper: dev_for_each_property

For example:
struct ofprop property;

dev_for_each_property(property, config) {
	value = dev_read_prop_by_prop(&property, &propname, &len);

or:

for (res = ofnode_get_first_property(node, &property);
     !res;
     res = ofnode_get_next_property(&property))
{
     value = ofnode_get_property_by_prop(&property, &propname, &len);
....
}

Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Functions for reading indexed values from device tree
Enhancements to 'dm' command
Log test enhancements and syslog driver
DM change to read parent ofdata before children
Minor fixes

At present a device can read its ofdata before its parent has done the
same. This can cause problems in the case where the parent has a 'ranges'
property, thus affecting the operation of dev_read_addr(), for example.

We already probe parent devices before children so it does not seem to be
a large step to do the same with ofdata.

Make the change and update the documentation in this area.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan@intel.com>

The content dm_ofnode_pre_reloc() is identical with ofnode_pre_reloc()
defined in drivers/core/ofnode.c and used only three times:
- drivers/core/lists.c:lists_bind_fdt()
- drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c::at91_clk_sub_device_bind
- drivers/clk/altera/clk-arria10.c::socfpga_a10_clk_bind

So this function dm_ofnode_pre_reloc can be removed and replaced
by these function calls by ofnode_pre_reloc().

Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Now reading a 32 bit value from a device-tree property can be expressed
as reading the first element of an array with a single value.

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

The patch adds helper functions to allow reading a single indexed u32
value from a device-tree property containing multiple u32 values, that
is an array of integers.

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

When removing a device the power domains it uses are generally powered
off. But when we are trying to unbind all devices (e.g. for running tests)
we don't want to probe a device in the 'remove' path.

Add a new flag to skip this power-down step.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

This failure path is tricky to debug since it continues after failure and
there are a lot of error paths. Add logging to help.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Use the new function dm_scan_fdt_ofnode_path() to scan all the nodes
which aren't devices themselves but may contain some:
- "/chosen"
- "/clocks"
- "/firmware"

The patch removes the strcmp call in recursive function dm_scan_fdt_live()
and also corrects a conflict with the 2 applied patches in
the commit 1712ca21924b ("dm: core: Scan /firmware node by default")
and in the commit 747558d01457 ("dm: fdt: scan for devices under
/firmware too"): the subnodes of "/firmware" (optee for example)
are bound 2 times.

For example the dm tree command result on STM32MP1 is:

STM32MP> dm tree
 Class     Index  Probed  Driver                Name
 -----------------------------------------------------------
 root          0  [ + ]   root_driver           root_driver
 firmware      0  [   ]   psci                  |-- psci
 sysreset      0  [   ]   psci-sysreset         |   `-- psci-sysreset
 simple_bus    0  [ + ]   generic_simple_bus    |-- soc
...
 tee           0  [ + ]   optee                 |-- optee
...
 tee           1  [   ]   optee                 `-- optee

Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@st.com>
Tested-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Variable count is initialized at the start of every round of the while
loop and it is not used after the while loop. So there is no need to
initialize it beforehand.

Identified by cppcheck.

Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>