Do not fail if any of the requested subtypes are not available, but set the
number of resources to 0 and continue parsing the resource ranges.

Based on Linux kernel patch by Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>

Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>

- Various gen5 fixes

Any host while requesting for a device can request for its exclusive
access. If an exclusive permission is obtained then it is the host's
responsibility to release the device before the software entity on
the host completes its execution. Else any other host's request for
the device will be nacked. So add a command that releases all the
exclusive devices that is acquired by the current host. This should
be used with utmost care and can be called only at the end of the
execution.

Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>

Add and expose a new processor shutdown API that wraps the two TISCI
messages involved in initiating a core shutdown. The API will first
queue a message to have the DMSC wait for a certain processor boot
status to happen followed by a message to trigger the actual shutdown-
with both messages being sent without waiting or requesting for a
response. Note that the processor shutdown API call will need to be
followed up by user software placing the respective core into either
WFE or WFI mode.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com>

Sysfw provides an option for requesting exclusive access for a
device using the flags MSG_FLAG_DEVICE_EXCLUSIVE. If this flag is
not used, the device is meant to be shared across hosts. Once a device
is requested from a host with this flag set, any request to this
device from a different host will be nacked by sysfw. Current tisci
driver enables this flag for every device requests. But this may not
be true for all the devices. So provide a separate commands in driver
for exclusive and shared device requests.

Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>

This adds separate kconfig options for drivers/sysreset and
drivers/firmware.

Up to now, CONFIG_SPL_DRIVERS_MISC_SUPPORT added drivers/misc to SPL
build but also added drivers/firmware and drivers/sysreset at the same
time.

Since that is confusing, this patch uses CONFIG_SPL_SYSRESET for
drivers/sysreset and adds CONFIG_SPL_FIRMWARE for
drivers/firmware (and accordingly for the TPL options).

CONFIG_SPL_DRIVERS_MISC_SUPPORT stays for including drivers/misc into
the SPL build (and accordingly for TPL) since there are boards using
non-DM (non UCLASS_MISC) files from drivers/misc. Such boards don't
have CONFIG_SPL_MISC enabled, so cannot use this to include
drivers/misc into the SPL build.

Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>

TI-SCI firmware will only respond to messages when the
TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED flag is set. Most messages
already do this, set this for the ones that do not.

Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
Tested-by: Alejandro Hernandez <ajhernandez@ti.com>
Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>

An earlier commit converted the TISCI receive timeouts to be specified
in ms rather than us however it failed to take this change into account
when passing the actual timeout to be used when invoking the mailbox
receive API. This leads to the actual timeout to be 1,000 times shorter
than expected and as a result certain TISCI operations would fail.

Fix the issue by converting the timeout declared in ms to us on the fly
as expected by the respective API.

Fixes: fd6b40b1ba20 ("firmware: ti_sci: Add support for NAVSS resource management")
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>

SYSFW version 2019.01 introduces a slightly modified version of this API,
add support for it here.

Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com>

TI-SCI message protocol provides support for controlling the firewall
configurations available in SoC.

Introduce support for the set of TI-SCI message protocol APIs that
provide us with this capability of controlling firewalls.

Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com>