u-boot.git/drivers/net, branch v2014.10-rc1

Change Andy Fleming's email address

2014-08-06T13:12:30Z

Messages to afleming@freescale.com now bounce, and should be directed to my personal address at afleming@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming

Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm

2014-07-29T13:41:35Z

Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc85xx

2014-07-28T18:54:29Z

Merge branch 'u-boot-ti/master' into 'u-boot-arm/master'

2014-07-28T10:26:21Z

Merge branch 'u-boot-sh/rmobile' into 'u-boot-arm/master'

2014-07-28T08:54:54Z

Merge branch 'u-boot-sunxi/master' into 'u-boot-arm/master'

2014-07-28T08:12:45Z

drivers: net: cpsw: add support for using second port as ethernet

2014-07-25T19:21:05Z

Add support for using the second slave port of cpsw to be used as primary ethernet. Signed-off-by: Mugunthan V N

net: sh-eth: Add support R8A7794

2014-07-24T05:03:46Z

R8A7794 has the same sh-ether IP core as other SH/rmobile. This patch adds support of R8A7794. Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu

stdio: Pass device pointer to stdio methods

2014-07-23T13:07:23Z

At present stdio device functions do not get any clue as to which stdio device is being acted on. Some implementations go to great lengths to work around this, such as defining a whole separate set of functions for each possible device. For driver model we need to associate a stdio_dev with a device. It doesn't seem possible to continue with this work-around approach. Instead, add a stdio_dev pointer to each of the stdio member functions. Note: The serial drivers have the same problem, but it is not strictly necessary to fix that to get driver model running. Also, if we convert serial over to driver model the problem will go away. Code size increases by 244 bytes for Thumb2 and 428 for PowerPC. 22: stdio: Pass device pointer to stdio methods arm: (for 2/2 boards) all +244.0 bss -4.0 text +248.0 powerpc: (for 1/1 boards) all +428.0 text +428.0 Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Acked-by: Marek Vasut Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut

net/fm: call fm_port_to_index() with proper checks

2014-07-22T23:25:53Z

Some of the fm_port_to_index() callers did not check for -1 return value and used -1 as an array index. Signed-off-by: Marian Rotariu Reviewed-by: York Sun