Enable driver to fetch the optional parameter (fifo-depth) from device
tree. If the parameter is not found in the device tree, it will use
the default value declared in the driver.

Signed-off-by: Pei Yue Ho <peiyue.ho@starfivetech.com>
Reviewed-by: Wei Liang Lim <weiliang.lim@starfivetech.com>
Reviewed-by: Eng Lee Teh <englee.teh@starfivetech.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>

Add i2c new register mode driver to support AST2600 i2c
new register mode. AST2600 i2c controller have legacy and
new register mode. The new register mode have global register
support 4 base clock for scl clock selection, and new clock
divider mode.

Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>

Printing the I2C controller base address in decimal notation
is not helpful.

Change it to hex notation, which is the standard format found
in the Reference Manual and devicetree.

Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
Acked-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>

Clock changes for 2023.04-rc1

This contains various fixes and small features. I've included a reset patch as
well since it was in the same series as a clock patch.

- A fix for a long standing bug that has been exposed by commit
  50128aeb0f8 ("cyclic: get rid of cyclic_init()") preventing 8xx boards
  from booting since u-boot 2023.01
- A GPIO driver for powerpc 8xx chip
- Fixup for powerpc 8xx SPI driver
- A new powerpc 8xx board
- The two devices having that board.

This allows devm_reset_control_get(dev, NULL) to work and get the first
reset control, which is common in code ported from Linux.

Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230122000252.53642-2-samuel@sholland.org

This allows devm_clock_get(dev, NULL) to work and get the first clock,
which is common in code ported from Linux.

Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230122000252.53642-1-samuel@sholland.org

[backport from linux commit 2626cf67f20b28446dfc3a5b9493dd535cdb747b]

According to the "Clock Root" table of the reference manual (document
IMX8MNRM Rev 2, 07/2022):

     Clock Root         offset     Source Select (CCM_TARGET_ROOTn[MUX])
        ...              ...                    ...
 ENET_PHY_REF_CLK_ROOT  0xAA80            000 - 24M_REF_CLK
                                          001 - SYSTEM_PLL2_DIV20
                                          010 - SYSTEM_PLL2_DIV8
                                          011 - SYSTEM_PLL2_DIV5
                                          100 - SYSTEM_PLL2_DIV2
                                          101 - AUDIO_PLL1_CLK
                                          110 - VIDEO_PLL_CLK
                                          111 - AUDIO_PLL2_CLK
        ...              ...                    ...

while the imx8mn_enet_phy_sels list didn't contained audio_pll1_out for
source select bits 101b.

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
Acked-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221219113127.528282-4-dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com

[backport from linux commit bedcf9d1dcf88ed38731f0ac9620e5a421e1e9d6]

Unlike audio_pll1 and audio_pll2, there is no video_pll2. Further, the
name used in the RM is video_pll. So, let's rename "video_pll1" to
"video_pll" to be consistent with the RM and avoid misunderstandings.

No functional changes intended.

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
Acked-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221219113127.528282-3-dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com

[backport from linux commit a429c60baefd95ab43a2ce7f25d5b2d7a2e431df]

The IMX8MN platform does not have any video processing unit (VPU), and
indeed in the reference manual (document IMX8MNRM Rev 2, 07/2022) there
is no occurrence of its pll. From an analysis of the code and the RM
itself, I think vpu pll is used instead of m7 alternate pll, probably
for copy and paste of code taken from modules of similar architectures.

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
Acked-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221219113127.528282-2-dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com