u-boot.git/fs/Makefile, branch v2025.01

Merge patch series "Tidy up use of 'SPL' and CONFIG_SPL_BUILD"

2024-10-11T18:23:25Z

Simon Glass says: When the SPL build-phase was first created it was designed to solve a particular problem (the need to init SDRAM so that U-Boot proper could be loaded). It has since expanded to become an important part of U-Boot, with three phases now present: TPL, VPL and SPL Due to this history, the term 'SPL' is used to mean both a particular phase (the one before U-Boot proper) and all the non-proper phases. This has become confusing. For a similar reason CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is set to 'y' for all 'SPL' phases, not just SPL. So code which can only be compiled for actual SPL, for example, must use something like this: #if defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) && !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD) In Makefiles we have similar issues. SPL_ has been used as a variable which expands to either SPL_ or nothing, to chose between options like CONFIG_BLK and CONFIG_SPL_BLK. When TPL appeared, a new SPL_TPL variable was created which expanded to 'SPL_', 'TPL_' or nothing. Later it was updated to support 'VPL_' as well. This series starts a change in terminology and usage to resolve the above issues: - The word 'xPL' is used instead of 'SPL' to mean a non-proper build - A new CONFIG_XPL_BUILD define indicates that the current build is an 'xPL' build - The existing CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is changed to mean SPL; it is not now defined for TPL and VPL phases - The existing SPL_ Makefile variable is renamed to SPL_ - The existing SPL_TPL Makefile variable is renamed to PHASE_ It should be noted that xpl_phase() can generally be used instead of the above CONFIGs without a code-space or run-time penalty. This series does not attempt to convert all of U-Boot to use this new terminology but it makes a start. In particular, renaming spl.h and common/spl seems like a bridge too far at this point. The series is fully bisectable. It has also been checked to ensure there are no code-size changes on any commit.

global: Use CONFIG_XPL_BUILD instead of CONFIG_SPL_BUILD

2024-10-11T17:44:48Z

Complete this rename for all directories outside arch/ board/ drivers/ and include/ Use the new symbol to refer to any 'SPL' build, including TPL and VPL Signed-off-by: Simon Glass

fs: Fix SPL build if SPL_FS_LOADER is enabled and FS_LOADER is disabled

2024-10-02T19:35:31Z

When SPL_FS_LOADER is set to y and FS_LOADER is not enabled, the SPL build fails with the following errors: AR spl/boot/built-in.o LD spl/u-boot-spl arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd: drivers/misc/fs_loader.o: in function `fw_get_filesystem_firmware': /u-boot/drivers/misc/fs_loader.c:162: undefined reference to `fs_set_blk_dev' arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd: /home/frh/tdx/src/u-boot/drivers/misc/ fs_loader.c:185: undefined reference to `fs_read' arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd: drivers/misc/fs_loader.o: in function `select_fs_dev': /u-boot/drivers/misc/fs_loader.c:89: undefined reference to `fs_set_blk_dev_with_part' make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.spl:527: spl/u-boot-spl] Error 1 make: *** [Makefile:2055: spl/u-boot-spl] Error 2 Fix it by replacing the FS_LOADER with SPL_FS_LOADER in the Makefile, so the fs.c with the necessary function definitions are compiled. Fixes: b071a07743d4 ("drivers: misc: Makefile: Enable fs_loader compilation at SPL Level") Suggested-by: Francesco Dolcini Signed-off-by: Hiago De Franco Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini

fs: drop reiserfs

2024-03-04T15:25:47Z

It was only included by a single board which doesn't appear to have ever used it for any default use cases so drop the filesystem now that isn't used by any in-tree configurations. Signed-off-by: Peter Robinson

fs: Add semihosting filesystem

2022-04-01T19:03:13Z

This adds a filesystem which is backed by the host's filesystem. It is modeled off of sandboxfs, which has very similar aims. Semihosting doesn't support listing directories (except with SYS_SYSTEM), so neither do we. it's possible to optimize a bit for the common case of reading a whole file by omitting a call to smh_seek, but this is left as a future optimization. Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson

fs/erofs: add erofs filesystem support

2022-03-15T20:19:29Z

This patch mainly deals with uncompressed files. Signed-off-by: Huang Jianan

fs/squashfs: new filesystem

2020-08-08T02:31:32Z

Add support for SquashFS filesystem. Right now, it does not support compression but support for zlib will be added in a follow-up commit. Signed-off-by: Joao Marcos Costa

cbfs: Allow CBFS to be used in SPL

2019-08-18T13:54:10Z

Add a new Kconfig option to enable CBFS in SPL. This can be useful when the memory-init code is in CBFS. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Reviewed-by: Bin Meng Tested-by: Bin Meng

fs: fat: Build only if CONFIG_FS_FAT=y

2019-04-26T21:53:16Z

Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno

spl: Kconfig: Replace CONFIG_SPL_EXT_SUPPORT to CONFIG_SPL_FS_EXT4

2019-02-01T14:14:21Z

Replace CONFIG_SPL_EXT_SUPPORT to CONFIG_SPLY_FS_EXT4 so both obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)FS_EXT4) and CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FS_EXT4) can be used to control the build in both SPL and U-Boot. Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee Reviewed-by: Tom Rini