Move this header to include/u-boot/ so that it can be used by external
tools.

Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@linaro.org>

Drop all duplicate newlines. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>

As part of bringing the master branch back in to next, we need to allow
for all of these changes to exist here.

Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.

This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.

Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

Remove <common.h> from all "fs/" files and when needed add
missing include files directly.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

[BUG]
Since btrfs supports single device RAID0 at mkfs time after btrfs-progs
v5.14, if we create a single device raid0 btrfs, and created a file
crossing stripe boundary:

  # mkfs.btrfs -m dup -d raid0 test.img
  # mount test.img mnt
  # xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 128K" mnt/file
  # umount mnt

Since btrfs is using 64K as stripe length, above 128K data write is
definitely going to cross at least one stripe boundary.

Then u-boot would fail to read above 128K file:

 => host bind 0 /home/adam/test.img
 => ls host 0
 <   >     131072  Fri Dec 30 00:18:25 2022  file
 => load host 0 0 file
 BTRFS: An error occurred while reading file file
 Failed to load 'file'

[CAUSE]
Unlike tree blocks read, data extent reads doesn't consider cases in which
one data extent can cross stripe boundary.

In read_data_extent(), we just call btrfs_map_block() once and read the
first mapped range.

And if the first mapped range is smaller than the desired range, it
would return error.

But since even single device btrfs can utilize RAID0 profiles, the first
mapped range can only be at most 64K for RAID0 profiles, and cause false
error.

[FIX]
Just like read_whole_eb(), we should call btrfs_map_block() in a loop
until we read all data.

Since we're here, also add extra error messages for the following cases:

- btrfs_map_block() failure
  We already have the error message for it.

- Missing device
  This should not happen, as we only support single device for now.

- __btrfs_devread() failure

With this bug fixed, btrfs driver of u-boot can properly read the above
128K file, and have the correct content:

 => host bind 0 /home/adam/test.img
 => ls host 0
 <   >     131072  Fri Dec 30 00:18:25 2022  file
 => load host 0 0 file
 131072 bytes read in 0 ms
 => md5sum 0 0x20000
 md5 for 00000000 ... 0001ffff ==> d48858312a922db7eb86377f638dbc9f
 ^^^ Above md5sum also matches.

Reported-by: Sam Winchenbach <swichenbach@tethers.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

When looking for a filesystem on a partition we should do so quietly. At
present if the filesystem is very small (e.g. 512 bytes) we get a host of
messages.

Update these to only show when debugging.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

This line probably got in by mistake as there is no fs_mutex member in
the btrfs_fs_info struct.

Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

Now btrfs can utilize the newly intorudced BLAKE2 hash.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

This message comes up a lot when scanning filesystems. It suggests to the
user that there is some sort of error, but in fact there is no reason to
expect that a particular partition has a btrfs filesystem. Other
filesystems don't print this error.

Turn it into a debug message.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>