This is the case when reading freshly created filesystem.
The error message is like the following:
    btrfs_read_superblock: No valid root_backup found!

Since the data from super_roots/root_backups is not actually used -
decided to rework btrfs_newest_root_backup() into
btrfs_check_super_roots() that will only check if super_roots
array is valid and correctly handle empty scenario.

As a result:
* btrfs_read_superblock() now only checks if super_roots array is valid;
  the case when it is empty is considered OK.
* removed root_backup pointer from btrfs_info,
  which would be NULL in case of empty super_roots.
* btrfs_read_superblock() verifies number of devices from the superblock
  itself, not newest root_backup.

Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Popovych <yevgenyp@pointgrab.com>
Cc: Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Cc: Sergey Struzh <sergeys@pointgrab.com>

Often during debugging session it's very interesting to see
what data we were dealing with. For example what we write or read
to/from memory or peripherals.

This change introduces functions that allow to dump binary
data with one simple function invocation like:
------------------->8----------------
print_hex_dump_bytes("", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, buf, len);
------------------->8----------------

which gives us the following:
------------------->8----------------
00000000: f2 b7 c9 88 62 61 75 64 72 61 74 65 3d 31 31 35  ....baudrate=115
00000010: 32 30 30 00 62 6f 6f 74 61 72 67 73 3d 63 6f 6e  200.bootargs=con
00000020: 73 6f 6c 65 3d 74 74 79 53 33 2c 31 31 35 32 30  sole=ttyS3,11520
00000030: 30 6e 38 00 62 6f 6f 74 64 65 6c 61 79 3d 33 00  0n8.bootdelay=3.
00000040: 62 6f 6f 74 66 69 6c 65 3d 75 49 6d 61 67 65 00  bootfile=uImage.
00000050: 66 64 74 63 6f 6e 74 72 6f 6c 61 64 64 72 3d 39  fdtcontroladdr=9
00000060: 66 66 62 31 62 61 30 00 6c 6f 61 64 61 64 64 72  ffb1ba0.loadaddr
00000070: 3d 30 78 38 32 30 30 30 30 30 30 00 73 74 64 65  =0x82000000.stde
00000080: 72 72 3d 73 65 72 69 61 6c 30 40 65 30 30 32 32  rr=serial0@e0022
00000090: 30 30 30 00 73 74 64 69 6e 3d 73 65 72 69 61 6c  000.stdin=serial
000000a0: 30 40 65 30 30 32 32 30 30 30 00 73 74 64 6f 75  0@e0022000.stdou
000000b0: 74 3d 73 65 72 69 61 6c 30 40 65 30 30 32 32 30  t=serial0@e00220
000000c0: 30 30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00..............
...
------------------->8----------------

Source of hexdump.c was copied from Linux kernel v4.7-rc2.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
Cc: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Cc: Mario Six <mario.six@gdsys.cc>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>

This causes errors when translating logical addresses to physical:
  btrfs_map_logical_to_physical: Cannot map logical address <addr> to physical
  btrfs_file_read: Error reading extent

The behavior of btrfs_map_logical_to_physical() is to stop traversing
CHUNK_TREE when it encounters first non-CHUNK_ITEM, which makes
only some portion of CHUNK_ITEMs being read.
Change it to skip over non-chunk items.

Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Popovych <yevgenyp@pointgrab.com>
Cc: Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Cc: Sergey Struzh <sergeys@pointgrab.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>

Add fs_get_type_name so we can get the current filesystem type.

Signed-off-by: Alex Kiernan <alex.kiernan@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com>

Found a crash while issuing ext4ls with a non-existent directory.
Crash test:

=> ext4ls mmc 0 1
** Can not find directory. **
data abort
pc : [<3fd7c2ec>]          lr : [<3fd93ed8>]
reloc pc : [<26f142ec>]    lr : [<26f2bed8>]
sp : 3f963338  ip : 3fdc3dc4     fp : 3fd6b370
r10: 00000004  r9 : 3f967ec0     r8 : 3f96db68
r7 : 3fdc99b4  r6 : 00000000     r5 : 3f96dc88  r4 : 3fdcbc8c
r3 : fffffffa  r2 : 00000000     r1 : 3f96e0bc  r0 : 00000002
Flags: nZCv  IRQs off  FIQs off  Mode SVC_32
Resetting CPU ...

resetting ...

Tested on SAMA5D2_Xplained board (sama5d2_xplained_mmc_defconfig)

Looks like crash is introduced by commit:
"fa9ca8a" fs/ext4/ext4fs.c: Free dirnode in error path of ext4fs_ls

Issue is that dirnode is not initialized, and then freed if the call
to ext4_ls fails. ext4_ls will not change the value of dirnode in this case
thus we have a crash with data abort.

I added initialization and a check for dirname being NULL.

Fixes: "fa9ca8a" fs/ext4/ext4fs.c: Free dirnode in error path of ext4fs_ls
Cc: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

This patch solves assert failed displayed in the console during a boot.
The root cause is that the ubifs_inode is not already allocated when
ubifs_printdir and ubifs_finddir functions are called.

Trace showing the issue:
feed 'boot.scr.uimg', ino 94, new f_pos 0x17b40ece
dent->ch.sqnum '7132', creat_sqnum 3886945402880
UBIFS assert failed in ubifs_finddir at 436
INODE ALLOCATION: creat_sqnum '7129'
Found U-Boot script /boot.scr.uimg

Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>

When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from.  So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry.  Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.

In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.

This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents.  There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

The mutex lock and unlock functions are stubbed out and mutex_is_locked
was 0.  This caused asserts to fail in ubifs code when checking that the
mutex was locked.  For example,

UBIFS assert failed in ubifs_change_lp at 540
UBIFS assert failed in ubifs_release_lprops at 278

Assume that the "mutex" is locked since that is the normal case when it
is checked in the ubifs code.

Signed-off-by: Bradley Bolen <bradleybolen@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>

The value at the end of the rom is not a pointer, it is an offset
relative to the end of rom.

Signed-off-by: Andre Heider <a.heider@gmail.com>