This updates the EFI stub codes to pass UEFI BIOS's system table
address to U-Boot payload so that U-Boot can utilize it.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

This adds the DM sysreset driver for EFI application support.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

The use_uart assignment should follow immediately after the call to
exit_boot_services(), in case we want some debug output after that.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Currently efi.h determines a few bits of its environment according to
config options. This falls apart with the efi stub support which may
result in efi.h getting pulled into the stub as well as real U-Boot
code. In that case, one may be 32bit while the other one is 64bit.

This patch changes the conditionals to use compiler provided defines
instead. That way we always adhere to the build environment we're in
and the definitions adjust automatically.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
[bmeng: added some comments to describe the __x86_64__ check]
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

If UEFI BIOS has the graphics output protocol (GOP), let's pass its
information to U-Boot payload so that U-Boot can utilize it (eg:
an EFI framebuffer driver).

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

UEFI specifies the calling convention used in Microsoft compilers;
first arguments of a function are passed in (%rcx, %rdx, %r8, %r9).

All other compilers use System V ABI by default, passing first integer
arguments of a function in (%rdi, %rsi, %rdx, %rcx, %r8, %r9).

These ABI also specify different sets of registers that must be preserved
across function calls (callee-saved).

GCC allows using the Microsoft calling convention by adding the ms_abi
attribute to a function declaration.

Current EFI implementation in U-Boot specifies EFIAPI for efi_main()
in the test apps but uses default calling convention in lib/efi.

Save efi_main() arguments in the startup code on x86_64;
use EFI calling convention for _relocate() on x86_64;
consistently use EFI calling convention for efi_main() everywhere.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Gorinov <ivan.gorinov@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>

If GetMemoryMap() fails, we really want to know EFI_BITS_PER_LONG
instead of BITS_PER_LONG. A space and LF are added in places where
error message is output to improve readability.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Attempting to use a toolchain that is preconfigured to generate code
for the 32-bit architecture (i386), for example, the i386-linux-gcc
toolchain on kernel.org, to compile the 64-bit EFI payload does not
build. This updates the makefile fragments to ensure '-m64' is passed
to toolchain when building the 64-bit EFI payload stub codes.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from.  So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry.  Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.

In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.

This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents.  There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

We have a large number of places where while we historically referenced
gd in the code we no longer do, as well as cases where the code added
that line "just in case" during development and never dropped it.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>