Now that we have a shorter name, we don't need this sort of thing. Just
use ubman instead.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Now that we have a shorter name, we don't need this sort of thing.
Drop it.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> # test_android

We know this is U-Boot so the prefix serves no purpose other than to
make things longer and harder to read. Drop it and rename the files.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> # test_android / test_dfu

This fixture name is quite long and results in lots of verbose code.
We know this is U-Boot so the 'u_boot_' part is not necessary.

But it is also a bit of a misnomer, since it provides access to all the
information available to tests. It is not just the console.

It would be too confusing to use con as it would be confused with
config and it is probably too short.

So shorten it to 'ubman'.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/CAFLszTgPa4aT_J9h9pqeTtLCVn4x2JvLWRcWRD8NaN3uoSAtyA@mail.gmail.com/

Use a different temporary dir for each test, to allow them to run in
parallel.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Target code and mkimage share the same hashing infrastructure. If one
is wrong, it's very likely that both are wrong in the same way. Thus
testing won't catch hash regressions. This already happened in
commit 92055e138f28 ("image: Drop if/elseif hash selection in
calculate_hash()"). None of the tests caught that CRC32 was broken.

Instead of testing hash_calculate() against itself, create a FIT with
containing a kernel with pre-calculated hashes. Then check the hashes
produced against the known good hashes.

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>