Now that we have a shorter name, we don't need this sort of thing. Just
use ubman instead.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Now that we have a shorter name, we don't need this sort of thing.
Drop it.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> # test_android

We know this is U-Boot so the prefix serves no purpose other than to
make things longer and harder to read. Drop it and rename the files.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> # test_android / test_dfu

This fixture name is quite long and results in lots of verbose code.
We know this is U-Boot so the 'u_boot_' part is not necessary.

But it is also a bit of a misnomer, since it provides access to all the
information available to tests. It is not just the console.

It would be too confusing to use con as it would be confused with
config and it is probably too short.

So shorten it to 'ubman'.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/CAFLszTgPa4aT_J9h9pqeTtLCVn4x2JvLWRcWRD8NaN3uoSAtyA@mail.gmail.com/

The primary motivation for having a sandbox without LTO build in CI is
to ensure that we don't have that option break. We now have the ability
to run tests of specific options being enabled/disabled, so drop the
parts of CI that build and test that configuration specifically and add
a build test instead. We still test that "NO_LTO=1" rather than editing
the config file works via the ftrace tests.

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

Now that everything is working, add a test to make sure that this
builds correctly.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>