Fix test_mmc_dev(), test_mmc_rescan(), test_mmc_info() not to use the
same configuration data that test_mmc_rd() does. Doing so causes the
following issues:

* The new code uncondtionally expects certain keys to exist in the
configuration data. These keys do not exist in existing configuration
data since they were not previously required, and there was no
notification re: a requirement to add these new keys. This causes test
failures due to thrown exceptions when accessing the non-existent keys.

* The new tests logically operate on different objects. test_mmc_rd()
operates on ranges of sectors on an MMC device (which may be the entire
set of sectors of a device, or a part of a device), whereas all the new
tests operate solely on entire devices. These are separate things, and
it's entirely likely that the user will wish to runs the two types of
tests on different sets of data; see the example configuration data that
this commit adds. Ideally, the new tests would have been added to a
separate Python file, since they aren' closely related to the existing
tests.

FIXME: Marek, can you please replace the "???" in this patch with some
reasonable looking data? Thanks.

Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Fixes: 4ffec8cdf512 ("test/py: mmc: Add 'mmc info' test")
Fixes: ce4b2cafa79c ("test/py: mmc: Add 'mmc rescan' test")
Fixes: 86dfd152c917 ("test/py: mmc: Add 'mmc dev' test")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>

- H6 Beelink GS1 board (Clément)
- Olimex A64-Teres-I board (Jonas)
- sunxi build fix for CONFIG_CMD_PXE|DHCP (Ondrej)
- Change include order (Jagan)
- EPHY clock changes (Jagan)
- EMAC enablement on Cubietruck Plus, BPI-M3 (Chen-Yu Tsai)

Add sample dm reset test for reset_get_by_index and
reset_get_by_index_nodev functionality code.

Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Add sample dm clk test for clk_get_by_index and
clk_get_by_index_nodev functionality code.

Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

display_options_get_banner_priv() overwrites bytes before the start of the
buffer if the buffer size is less then 3. This case occurs in the Sandbox
when executing the `ut_print` command.

Correctly handle small buffer sizes. Adjust the print unit test to catch
when bytes before the buffer are overwritten.

Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

The cache UCLASS will be used for configure settings that can be found
in a CPU's L2 cache controller.

Add a uclass and a test for cache.

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>

AVB 2.0 spec. revision 1.1 introduces support for named persistent values
that must be tamper evident and allows AVB to store arbitrary key-value
pairs [1].

Introduce implementation of two additional AVB operations
read_persistent_value()/write_persistent_value() for retrieving/storing
named persistent values.

Correspondent pull request in the OP-TEE OS project repo [2].

[1]: https://android.googlesource.com/platform/external/avb/+/android-9.0.0_r22
[2]: https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/pull/2699

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Igor Opaniuk <igor.opaniuk@gmail.com>

Pull request for UEFI sub-system for v2019.07-rc1 (3)

This patch series reworks the implementation of the `bootefi` command to
remove code duplication by using the LoadImage() boot service to load
binaries.

Missing short texts for UEFI protocols are added for display by the
`efidebug dh` command.

Missing parameter checks for AllocatePages() and CreateDeviceNode() are
implemented.

The constants for protocol GUIDs are changed to match the names in the UEFI
specification.

If CONFIG_UNIT_TEST is enabled we should enable the individual tests by
default to ensure good test coverage.

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>

The EBBR specification prescribes that we should have either an ACPI table
or a device tree but not both.

So do not run the device tree unit test on boards with an ACPI table.
Hence there is no need any longer to make it 'on request' only.
Do not pass $fdtcontroladdr to `bootefi selftest`.

Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>