| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
mchp_gpio_get_value() should return int instead of bool, and some casts
are needed.
Signed-off-by: Eoin Dickson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <[email protected]>
|
|
The ADP5587 is a simpler version of the ADP5588. The ADP5588 can
configure two pins, C8 and C9, as GPIOs or light sensors. The ADP5587
does not include the light sensors.
Signed-off-by: Philip Molloy <[email protected]>
|
|
In gpio_dwapb_bind plat is used to reference memory allocated by
devm_kcalloc but it is attempted to be freed using kfree. Instead free
this memory using the correct devm_kfree function.
This issue was found by Smatch.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Goodbody <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Quentin Schulz <[email protected]>
|
|
The 'dev' parameter in the zynq_gpio_get_bank_pin function was not
described in its kernel-doc comment block, leading to a Sparse warning.
drivers/gpio/zynq_gpio.c:194: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev'
not described in 'zynq_gpio_get_bank_pin'
Add a description for the 'dev' parameter to satisfy the documentation
requirements and improve code clarity for this function.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Yadav Abbarapu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
|
|
This driver adds GPIO support for PolarFire SoC family, this is required
to add sd card support on the Beagle-V-Fire as it uses GPIO chip selects
Signed-off-by: Eoin Dickson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <[email protected]>
|
|
DM_GPIO_LOOKUP_LABEL and SPL_DM_GPIO_LOOKUP_LABEL had the same
description and therefore appeared to be duplicates in Kconfig frontends
Signed-off-by: Philip Molloy <[email protected]>
|
|
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-snapdragon
CI: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-snapdragon/-/pipelines/27056
- Fix unused access in ufetch
- Add missing clock for SM8650
- Port the Linux SPMI GPIO driver and port over SM8550 (other platforms
should follow)
|
|
Move support of the pm8550 gpios to the newly introduced
driver and drop the compatible entry and the read-only quirk
at the same time from the old driver.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Rui Miguel Silva <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Sumit Garg <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630-topic-sm8x50-pmic-gpio-pinctrl-new-v2-2-cc1512931197@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Casey Connolly <[email protected]>
|
|
The current qcom_pmic_gpio driver is too limited and doesn't
support state tracking for all pins like the Linux driver.
Adding full pinconf support would require adding the state
and it's much simpler to restart from scratch with a new
driver based on the Linux one adapted to the U-Boot GPIO
and Pinctrl APIs.
For now only the PMICs I've been able to validate are
added in the compatible list but we should be able to
add the entire list from the Linux driver.
There's a few difference from the Linux driver:
- no IRQ support
- uses the U-Boot GPIO flags that maps very well
- uses the gpio-ranges to get the pins count
- no debugfs but prints the pin state via pinmux callback
It uses the same CONFIG entry as the old one, since
the ultimate goal is to migrate entirely on this new
driver once we verify it doesn't break the older
platforms.
Tested-by: Alexey Minnekhanov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Rui Miguel Silva <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Sumit Garg <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630-topic-sm8x50-pmic-gpio-pinctrl-new-v2-1-cc1512931197@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Casey Connolly <[email protected]>
|
|
A large number of gpio drivers cannot build without access to some platform
specific header files. Express those requirements in Kconfig as well.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
|
|
This driver has no users after we removed the last supported platform in
2023.
Fixes: 7a3ee61f5551 ("arm: Remove omap5_uevm board")
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
|
|
In the current implementation, the GPIO read operation considers
both the input and outbut bits (bits 0 and 1). It should only consider
the state of input bit, i.e bit 0. To address this, mask input bit
alone and read it.
Signed-off-by: Aswin Murugan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Casey Connolly <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Casey Connolly <[email protected]>
|
|
Tom Rini <[email protected]> says:
Given Simon's series at [1] I started looking in to what brings in
<env.h> when not strictly required and in turn has some unintended
implicit includes. This series takes care of the places where, commonly,
<linux/string.h> or <env.h> itself were required along with a few other
less common cases. This sets aside for the moment what to do about
net-common.h and env_get_ip() as I'm not entirely sure what's best
there.
[1]: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=454939&state=*
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
This driver takes a long implicit include path to get this header which
it directly uses. Add it.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
|
|
Releasing a GPIO on Tegra necessitates changing its configuration to SFIO
to activate its special function. Without this reconfiguration, the special
function will be unavailable.
Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <[email protected]>
|
|
Now that this functionality is modeled using the device tree and
regulator uclass, the named GPIO is not referenced anywhere. Remove
it, along with the rest of the support for AXP virtual GPIOs.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]>
|
|
Tom Rini <[email protected]> says:
This series switches to always using $(PHASE_) in Makefiles when
building rather than $(PHASE_) or $(XPL_). It also starts on documenting
this part of the build, but as a follow-up we need to rename
doc/develop/spl.rst and expand on explaining things a bit.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
It is confusing to have both "$(PHASE_)" and "$(XPL_)" be used in our
Makefiles as part of the macros to determine when to do something in our
Makefiles based on what phase of the build we are in. For consistency,
bring this down to a single macro and use "$(PHASE_)" only.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
|
|
Some Qualcomm boards feature reserved ranges of pins which are protected
by firmware. Attempting to read or write any registers associated with
these pins results the board resetting.
Add support for parsing these ranges from devicetree and ensure that the
pinctrl and GPIO drivers don't try to interact with these pins.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250410-topic-sm8x50-pinctrl-reserved-ranges-v2-1-654488392b9a@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <[email protected]>
|
|
When a special pin is output only, the current code would return 0,
but if the pin is output only we can get the output value.
Try to return the output value and in all the other cases return
an error instead of 0.
Fixes: f9bb539460d ("gpio: msm: add support for special pins")
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250401-topic-sm8x50-msm-gpio-special-fixes-v1-2-a1148a02bb16@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <[email protected]>
|
|
The get_function callback wrongly returns 0 for special pins,
return the appropriate pin function by probing into the special
pins data fields to find if the pin is gpio capable.
Fixes: f9bb539460d ("gpio: msm: add support for special pins")
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250401-topic-sm8x50-msm-gpio-special-fixes-v1-1-a1148a02bb16@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <[email protected]>
|
|
Greg Malysa <[email protected]> says:
This series adds all of the supported peripheral drivers for the sc5xx
series of SoCs from Analog Devices and other drivers that are used by
the evaluation kits, such as a GPIO expander used by the EZLITE carrier
boards. This series passes gitlab CI tests.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
This adds support for the ADP588 GPIO expander from Analog Devices. It
is accessed over I2C and provides up to 18 pins. It is largely a port of
the Linux driver developed by Michael Hennerich
<[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ian Roberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Malysa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vasileios Bimpikas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Utsav Agarwal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arturs Artamonovs <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Gaskell <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Barrett-Morrison <[email protected]>
|
|
This adds support for using the GPIO pins on the SC5XX family of SoCs
from Analog Devices.
Co-developed-by: Nathan Barrett-Morrison <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Barrett-Morrison <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Ian Roberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ian Roberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vasileios Bimpikas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Utsav Agarwal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arturs Artamonovs <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Gaskell <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Malysa <[email protected]>
|
|
This uses Heinrich's merge of lib/efi_loader/efi_net.c which results in
no changes.
|
|
Currently, Kconfig allows building CONFIG_DM_74X164 without
CONFIG_DM_SPI, which results in linker errors because this driver
actually uses dm_spi_* functions:
drivers/gpio/74x164_gpio.o: in function `gen_74x164_write_conf':
undefined reference to `dm_spi_claim_bus'
undefined reference to `dm_spi_xfer'
undefined reference to `dm_spi_release_bus'
Signed-off-by: J. Neuschäfer <[email protected]>
|
|
Prepare v2025.04-rc3
|
|
Add support to NXP GPIO expanders pcal6408, documented at [1], and
pcal6416, documented at [2].
[1] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/PCAL6408A.pdf
[2] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/PCAL6416A.pdf
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Ghidoli <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]>
|
|
Requesting of PMIC's GPIO child should be done by binding
GPIO driver to PMIC's node is GPIO driver does not have
its own node.
This reverts commit c03cd98d1a163666b4addcdd9a34fc0c77dfd0a5.
Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]>
|
|
i.MX93-11x11-EVK has switched to use upstream device tree, and use
"adi,adp5585". Since i.MX93-11x11-EVK is the only user of this driver,
so it is safe to drop "adp5585".
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
|
|
J. Neuschäfer <[email protected]> says:
This patchset contains a few small fixes/cleanups for the MPC83xx
platform.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The mpc8xxx_gpio driver contains a workaround for certain chips
where the previously written state of outputs cannot be read back
from the GPIO data (GPDAT) register (MPC8572/MPC8536). This workaround
consists of tracking the state of GPDAT in a "shadow register" (i.e. a
software variable). The shadow register is initialized to zero.
This results in a problem w.r.t. outputs that are configured to a
high (1) state before U-Boot runs, but not touched by U-Boot itself:
Due to the zero-initialization, these GPIOs end up being set to zero,
the first time that any other output is set.
To avoid such issues initialize the GPDAT shadow register to the value
previously held by any outputs, if possible. On MPC8572/MPC8536 this
should make no difference, i.e. the shadow register should be
initialized to zero on these chips.
This patch has been tested on a MPC8314E-based board.
Reviewed-by: Sinan Akman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: J. Neuschäfer <[email protected]>
|
|
Base on GPIO hog to support sgpio persist enable feature.
Signed-off-by: Jim Liu <[email protected]>
|
|
Prepare v2025.01-rc5
|
|
The correct spelling is R-Car, including the dash, update the usage.
Kconfig strings and comment changes only, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
|
|
have_dual_base is set to false, so the 8ulp_data will be put in BSS
section which conflicts with the area of u-boot.dtb which padded just
after u-boot-nodtb.bin. So move 8ulp_data to data section to avoid
its content being corrupted by dtb.
Fixes: 51cfa66f2c4 ("gpio: imx_rgpio2p: support one address")
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
|
|
not implmentated
Currently in _dm_gpio_set_flags() when set_flags ops is not implemented
direction_output()/_input() is used, but pull up/down is not supported by
these ops.
Signed-off-by: Zixun LI <[email protected]>
|
|
Add ops get_dir_flags() to read status from GPIO registers.
Signed-off-by: Zixun LI <[email protected]>
|
|
Support GPIO configuration with following flags:
- in, out, out_active
- open_drain, pull_up
Signed-off-by: Zixun LI <[email protected]>
|
|
This patch adds support for determining whether a gpio pin is mapped as
peripheral function.
Signed-off-by: Zixun LI <[email protected]>
|
|
The qcom_pmic code is broken for new PMICs and should be fixed,
without the QUIRK the code is broken and the GPIOs don't work
anymore on SM8550 and SM8650 platforms.
Partially revert the revert and only add the quirk on the PM8550
PMIC, making the buttons and MMC detect gpio work again.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Caleb Connolly <[email protected]>
|
|
Billy Tsai <[email protected]> says:
AST2600 SoC has 2 SGPIO master interfaces one with 128 pins another one
with 80 pins, AST2500/AST2400 SoC has 1 SGPIO master interface that
supports up to 80 pins.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The Aspeed SGPIO driver supports the SGPIO controllers found in the
AST2400, AST2500 and AST2600 BMC SoCs. The implementation is a cut-down
copy of the upstream Linux kernel driver, adapted for u-boot.
Signed-off-by: Billy Tsai <[email protected]>
|
|
Starting with Linux commit 7569486d79ae ("gpio: dwapb: Add ngpios
DT-property support") the "snps,nr-gpios" property was marked
as deprecated.
And since all newly added dw-apb-gpio nodes are described using generic
"ngpios" property, it's time to add support for it.
Signed-off-by: Maksim Kiselev <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <[email protected]>
|
|
* Fixes a warning about implicit declaration of udelay.
Signed-off-by: Philip Balister <[email protected]>
|
|
Assorted Tegra enhancements. Merged with the recent XPL_BUILD changes,
resolve some whitespace issues and fix the name of the new apalis-tk1
env file by Tom.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
|
|
In some cases access to GPIOs is needed so early that DM
is not ready even nearly. These functions are exactly for
this case.
Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <[email protected]>
|
|
Simon Glass <[email protected]> says:
When the SPL build-phase was first created it was designed to solve a
particular problem (the need to init SDRAM so that U-Boot proper could
be loaded). It has since expanded to become an important part of U-Boot,
with three phases now present: TPL, VPL and SPL
Due to this history, the term 'SPL' is used to mean both a particular
phase (the one before U-Boot proper) and all the non-proper phases.
This has become confusing.
For a similar reason CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is set to 'y' for all 'SPL'
phases, not just SPL. So code which can only be compiled for actual SPL,
for example, must use something like this:
#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) && !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD)
In Makefiles we have similar issues. SPL_ has been used as a variable
which expands to either SPL_ or nothing, to chose between options like
CONFIG_BLK and CONFIG_SPL_BLK. When TPL appeared, a new SPL_TPL variable
was created which expanded to 'SPL_', 'TPL_' or nothing. Later it was
updated to support 'VPL_' as well.
This series starts a change in terminology and usage to resolve the
above issues:
- The word 'xPL' is used instead of 'SPL' to mean a non-proper build
- A new CONFIG_XPL_BUILD define indicates that the current build is an
'xPL' build
- The existing CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is changed to mean SPL; it is not now
defined for TPL and VPL phases
- The existing SPL_ Makefile variable is renamed to SPL_
- The existing SPL_TPL Makefile variable is renamed to PHASE_
It should be noted that xpl_phase() can generally be used instead of
the above CONFIGs without a code-space or run-time penalty.
This series does not attempt to convert all of U-Boot to use this new
terminology but it makes a start. In particular, renaming spl.h and
common/spl seems like a bridge too far at this point.
The series is fully bisectable. It has also been checked to ensure there
are no code-size changes on any commit.
|
|
Use PHASE_ as the symbol to select a particular XPL build. This means
that SPL_TPL_ is no-longer set.
Update the comment in bootstage to refer to this symbol, instead of
SPL_
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]>
|
|
Use XPL_ as the symbol to indicate an SPL build. This means that SPL_ is
no-longer set.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]>
|
